The most recent poll of the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion prepared by Dr. Nabil Kukali has revealed that:
(83.0 %) of the Palestinians support at present the Palestinian-Israeli cease-fire.
(56.0 %) oppose the suicide bombings inside Israel.
(32.9 %) hold Hamas responsible for the schism of the authority between Gaza Strip and the West Bank, (15.5 %) blame Fateh for that.
(59.8 %) support the two-state solution as the favored solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
(54.3 %) are dissatisfied with the performance of the PA President, Mr. Mahmoud Abbas.
(89.8 %) oppose the waiver of the Right of Home Return.

The most recent Gaza ceasefire, in November 2006, quickly unravelled A ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has begun, despite a last-minute flurry of cross-border attacks.The truce is designed to halt Israeli incursions into the Gaza Strip, and to stop missiles being fired from Gaza into southern Israel. If it holds, Israel will ease its blockade on Gaza and there may be further talks on a prisoner exchange. Correspondents say the eve-of-truce attacks underline how fragile the agreement could be. There were no reports of fire from either side on Thursday morning.
Israel and Hamas will begin a ceasefire on Thursday, a Palestinian official has said. “Implementation of the truce will begin at 6am (0300 GMT) on Thursday,” the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said on Tuesday. Hamas said it would respect the six-month deal, which materialised after months of mediation by Egypt.
Il 22 giugno Mons. Fouad Twal sarà insediato come nuovo Patriarca latino di Gerusalemme. Formato a Roma nella diplomazia vaticana, poi chiamato a tornare alla vita pastorale come arcivescovo di Tunisi, il futuro Patriarca di Gerusalemme vuole mettere l’accento sui fondamenti spirituali della vita cristiana, e specialmente la gioia, quella di vivere in Cristo. Per Mons. Twal, in effetti, è innanzitutto la qualità della vita evangelica che permetterà alla Chiesa di Terra Santa di non essere schiacciata dalla croce che porta, e di andare avanti.

Domenica 22 giugno, nella basilica del Santo Sepolcro avrà luogo l’ingresso del nuovo patriarca di Gerusalemme dei Latini, monsignor Fouad Twal, sino ad ora arcivescovo coadiutore del Patriarcato. (more..)
Sharif Hamadeh, The Electronic Intifada, 30 May 2008
This month Israel celebrated its 60th anniversary and a panoply of politicians and celebrities honored its achievements. The star attraction at the official celebrations was undoubtedly US President George W. Bush, whose praise for Israel reached Biblical proportions. Echoing both Theodor Herzl and the Old Testament in his speech before the Knesset, Bush called the Jewish state “a light unto the nations.” But while Israel and its allies applauded six decades of Israeli independence, we Palestinians commemorated the Nakba, our catastrophe, our darkness.
Commemorating the Nakba means recognizing that 60 years of Israeli independence also marks 60 years of Palestinian dispossession; that 60 years of Israeli statehood also marks 60 years of Palestinian statelessness; and that 60 years of Jewish freedom in Israel also marks 60 years of unfreedom for Palestinians.
It was not always clear that Palestinians would remember themselves. One of the most widely repeated quotes attributed to David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, captures his dismissal of Palestinian pre-existence in what became Israel. “The old will die and the young will forget,” he reputedly said. This was only half right: four generations of refugees later, we have not forgotten.
From Beit Lahiya to Beirut, from Nablus to New York, and from Lydd to London, we still remember. We remember how our homeland was partitioned against the will of the majority. We remember how our families fled in fear of massacre and rape, with thousands forced out by Zionist militias. And we remember that while the 1948 War for Palestine wiped our country off the map, it failed to erase our peoplehood.
The act of remembering is in this sense also an act of resistance. We refuse to submit; we decline to disappear; we reject the whiting out of our indigeneity. Through small acts of cultural resistance at home and in exile, we are reclaiming our history.
The establishment of the Nakba Archive, by Palestinians in Lebanon, is a case in point. The Archive, a fraction of which was screened in London’s Palestine Film Festival, collates video testimonies from survivors of the 750,000 Palestinians who became refugees in the 1948 War. Currently, it boasts approximately 1,000 hours of interviews conducted with some 500 refugees from over 130 villages. It also maintains an excellent website at www.nakba-archive.org.
A similar project has been initiated in Israel itself, where filmmaker Raneen Geries has recorded testimonies of Palestinian women who were internally displaced in the 1948 War. Just as the fact that Israeli forces destroyed and depopulated over 500 Palestinian villages in the war is little known outside the Arab world, so the history of the internal displacement of approximately 40,000 Palestinians within Israel has been largely silenced. Projects like these are of vital importance because they genuinely give a voice to the voiceless.
But these projects also remind us of a disquieting truth: the Nakba is not over. There are echoes of 1948 among the recent waves of forced migration from conflicts in Iraq and Lebanon, where Palestinian families became refugees for a second, third or even fourth time.
There are echoes of 1948 in the approximately 40 “unrecognized” villages in the south of Israel, where Palestinian citizens of Israel today remain prey to yet further displacement and dispossession. Villages like Atir and Umm al-Hieran have already suffered home demolitions as Israeli authorities prepare for their evacuation and replacement with new, exclusively Jewish, towns.
And there are echoes of 1948 in the collective punishment that is still being inflicted on Palestinians today, most notably in the embargoed Gaza Strip, where approximately 70 percent of the population of 1.5 million are registered refugees. Meanwhile, in the occupied West Bank, Israel’s unlawful construction of settlements and the wall is still expropriating Palestinian land for Israeli settlers, still separating family members from one another, and still denying Palestinians freedom of movement in the land of their birth.
The matrix of vulnerabilities that attend this state of statelessness raises an obvious question: if the Nakba is still in progress, then how will it end? Few people believe Annapolis holds the answer. As Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas recently admitted, “Nothing has been achieved in the negotiations with Israel yet.” For all their efforts, neither Abbas nor his appointed Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has secured American intervention to enforce Israel’s commitment to freeze settlement expansion. Almost half a million Israeli settlers already live in occupied Palestinian territory, yet Israel continues building to increase this figure yet further.
By now it should be clear that reliance on American benevolence is no strategy for national liberation. As Israeli settlement expansion continues apace, the prospects of a viable Palestinian state emerging at all, let alone by 2009, look ever more remote. Forget Palestine; at this rate, the scraps of land remaining for an “independent” state alongside Israel would have to take their name from a recent novel: Absurdistan.
But if the two-state solution is obsolete, the growing support for a one-state solution should reassure Israelis and Palestinians alike. Within a single democratic state that recognizes the equal value of all its citizens, irrespective of ethno-religious affiliation, we could begin to build a new history of peaceful cooperation and coexistence. This state would truly be a light unto the nations. And when such a state extended invitations to its birthday party, all its peoples could join in the celebrations.
Sharif Hamadeh is a former advisor to the PLO’s Negotiations Affairs Department and a former fellow of Adalah - the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel. He is currently completing his legal studies in London as a Lord Mansfield scholar of Lincoln’s Inn. This commentary first appeared in Adalah’s Newsletter, Volume 48, May 2008, and is republished with the author’s permission
La pace con la Siria, cui seguirebbe quella col Libano, permetterebbe allo Stato ebraico di essere in pace con tutti i suoi vicini, allontanerebbe Damasco da Teheran, costringendo Hezbollah a divenire un normale partito politico, e avrebbe effetti anche sui palestinesi. Perché non riconvocare la Conferenza di Madrid, si chiede un esperto osservatore di vicende religiose e politiche mediorientali. English version (more..)
Orthodox Jews set fire to hundreds of copies of the New Testament in the latest act of violence against Christian missionaries in Or Yehuda (Tel Aviv District, Israel)
Or Yehuda Deputy Mayor Uzi Aharon said missionaries recently entered a neighborhood in the predominantly religious town of 34,000 in central Israel, distributing hundreds of New Testaments and missionary material.

Giordania e Israele uniti in un megaprogetto per desalinizzare il grande lago
L’ambiente, d’accordo. L’economia, la cooperazione, lo sviluppo. «Ma dopo la desalinizzazione si potrà galleggiare ancora sul Mar Morto?». L’idea d’un trapianto eccezionale d’acqua dolce nel lago più denso e depresso del pianeta suscita perplessità nei turisti americani coperti di fango dalla testa ai piedi che prendono il sole sulla terrazza dello stabilimento Bianqini, una cinquantina di chilometri a est di Gerusalemme. Carol Goodman è venuta da Los Angeles con la famiglia: «Una Spa unica». Se solo fosse eterna.
Un sondaggio dell’”Indicatore Pace e Guerra” del mese di aprile, eseguito dall’Università di Tel Aviv, e pubblicato martedì, rivela che il 70% degli ebrei israeliani non crede vi sia la possibilità di un accordo di pace con i palestinesi o di proseguire i negoziati.Parallelamente, il 57% dei partecipanti al sondaggio sostiene la necessità del dialogo con i palestinesi, e il 70%, la nascita di uno stato palestinese accanto a Israele; il 55% è contrario a lasciare che i palestinesi prendano il controllo su qualche quartiere di Gerusalemme est. L’83% si oppone a consegnare Gerusalemme est ai palestinesi, il 60% alla gestione congiunta israelo-palestinese, della Spianata di al-Aqsa. (more..)